Search found 289 matches
- Mon May 20, 2024 1:08 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 29902
Re: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
-Remove_SF command also overwrites source file. Not sure if this is intended behaviour, but there is some data loss risk as it behaves different from the most common behaviour that is to create a new file with the commands used in the name.
- Mon May 20, 2024 1:03 pm
- Forum: Requests, new functionalities
- Topic: -REMOVE_SF no index, delete current SF if any
- Replies: 7
- Views: 116012
Re: -REMOVE_SF no index, delete current SF if any
Hi, Thanks for the addition, yet I think something is not working properly. It seems like the single character SF are properly set up as current and removed when using -Remove -1 But with "Alpha" "Composite" fields it says it does not exist while they do :\ Check attached img. ht...
- Mon May 20, 2024 11:48 am
- Forum: 3DMASC
- Topic: Feature output missmatch between CC & 3DMASC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 130
Re: Feature output missmatch between CC & 3DMASC
awesome catch! I'll check that out. !!
- Tue May 14, 2024 12:47 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: [latest alpha] New scalarfields not proposed when saving
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4595
- Mon May 13, 2024 7:52 am
- Forum: 3DMASC
- Topic: Feature output missmatch between CC & 3DMASC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 130
Feature output missmatch between CC & 3DMASC
Hi, So, I was trying again to train a classifier and left it overnight for in the morning to find a somewhat meh ressult. So I was checking the computed feature scalar fields when I noticed the looked quite different from the onces I did compute manually in order to guess the correct scale for the c...
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:25 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: [latest alpha] New scalarfields not proposed when saving
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4595
Re: [latest alpha] New scalarfields not proposed when saving
This is still the case in the current stable version.
- Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:33 pm
- Forum: Coffee place
- Topic: I used Intensely to process the MMS data for this game.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2199
I used Intensely to process the MMS data for this game.
https://youtu.be/0ByHjieQcS4 The track is MMS scan from Virtual Shizuoka Dataset. BKG is Aerial Scan. Processing the data was hell, but managed to build a somewhat reasonable workflow yet mesh retopology and cloud segmentation remain the main challenges. I'll add references to CC in credits or launc...
- Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:53 pm
- Forum: Requests, new functionalities
- Topic: quick c2c to SF
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3178
Re: quick c2c to SF
thanks for the explanation!.
Yeah sure, totally understand that not mainstream features not to be implemented.
Yeah sure, totally understand that not mainstream features not to be implemented.
- Mon Jan 22, 2024 9:26 pm
- Forum: Requests, new functionalities
- Topic: quick c2c to SF
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3178
Re: quick c2c to SF
But when I create an octree with Edit>Octree>Compute In the DBtree when I set to visualize the octree, the lowest values are the sparse ones and as octree goes up there are more points, should then octree 1 be the simplest way to compute distances? It is wild that the preview can´t be baked as an SF...
- Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:20 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: [latest alpha] New scalarfields not proposed when saving
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4595
Re: [latest alpha] New scalarfields not proposed when saving
this happens with user interface. When I save as .las. For example, if you compute PCV. When you save the file, on the "extra escalar fields" tab PCV does not show up automatically. In the past this was seamless with a checkbox, which was automatically enabled. I don´t mind the new UI, it ...