Which graphic card and screen (resolution, technology, etc.) are you working with?
Have you tried to change the projection mode? Are the coordinates of the points too large maybe? (in which case the points may not appear where they really are in space...).
Search found 7421 matches
- Wed May 29, 2024 6:00 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: Cant measure or do pointpicking anymore
- Replies: 1
- Views: 46
- Wed May 29, 2024 5:58 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Refining the ground features
- Replies: 2
- Views: 34
Re: Refining the ground features
I'm a bit puzzled by the fact that you seem to work with a (Delaunay?) mesh instead of the point cloud... Is there any reason for that?
- Wed May 29, 2024 5:53 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Refining the ground features
- Replies: 2
- Views: 34
Re: Refining the ground features
With the Cross section tool, you have to 'extract' the slice (= create a new entity). This will duplicate the data, so that's safe. And then you can run the process on this excerpt. But that has to be done explicitly each time. Then remove the subset cloud if you don't use it anymore. (also, unrelat...
- Wed May 29, 2024 5:50 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: no Qt platform plugin could be initialized
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2756
Re: no Qt platform plugin could be initialized
Or maybe that's a super smart protection to prevent people from creating their own installer of Cloudcompare and infringing the GPL license ;) Just kidding. The only other culprit I see is the Visual Studio 2019 Installation framework you used. I don't know anything about it, but I guess an installe...
- Wed May 29, 2024 5:45 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
- Replies: 8
- Views: 30311
Re: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
It's just that it's a 'utility' function and not a real algorithm/process. You could call it 3 or 5 times with different SF names, and that would make a super long 'composite' name...
- Wed May 29, 2024 5:44 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: "Windows fatal exception: code 0xc000001d" when trying to install PCL plugin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 22
Re: "Windows fatal exception: code 0xc000001d" when trying to install PCL plugin
Hi,
Maybe it would be better to ask this question on the project's github page (as an issue). I'm not sure Paul (the maintainer of the CloudCompy project)ever comes on this forum.
Unless you also get this error when running the standard version of CloudCompare of course ;)
Maybe it would be better to ask this question on the project's github page (as an issue). I'm not sure Paul (the maintainer of the CloudCompy project)ever comes on this forum.
Unless you also get this error when running the standard version of CloudCompare of course ;)
- Sun May 26, 2024 10:07 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: saving Info of fitted plane
- Replies: 2
- Views: 243
Re: saving Info of fitted plane
At minimum, I've increased the timestamp resolution of the output files in this version: https://www.cloudcompare.org/release/Cl ... up_x64.exe
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:36 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Polyline Export Options
- Replies: 1
- Views: 160
Re: Polyline Export Options
So if you have a single polyline, you can simply highlight its 'vertices' and save it as an ASCII cloud. With this format, you'll get all the associated pieces of information (if any), and a choice to output a header or even the number of points. Otherwise, I don't know any other simple 'common' for...
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:32 am
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
- Replies: 8
- Views: 30311
Re: risky behaviour of CLI hwen using -FEATURE
I've just looked at the code, and I don't see any 'auto-save' call associated to this option. So you have to manually call -SAVE_CLOUDS. But by default a timestamp is added to the original filename. Therefore, the only way to overwrite the original file is either to voluntarily disable the timestamp...
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:18 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Interpretation of C2M signed distances when the distance between points is great
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2314
Re: Interpretation of C2M signed distances when the distance between points is great
Hi, I finally found the time to look at your data. First, that's probably a detail, but since the radius of the hole is around 0.75 units, I think the distance of 0.7 units for the central part of the bottom of the hole is not inconsistent: hole_diameter.JPG But anyway, you are correct, the RMS of t...