Compute 2.5D Volume Report Questions
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2022 3:38 pm
Hey!
I'm sorry if I'm asking a dumb question and misunderstanding something fundamental, but I cannot understand some of the values from the volume computation tool.
I am currently trying to estimate earthworks volume between two sequential aerial scans.
I've been looking at the volume computation algorithm in the source and the help.
I believe I have a somewhat decent understanding of the algorithm, but I cannot understand why Volume is computed, essentially, as (Added volume - Removed volume).
Shouldn't the two be added as an absolute value in order to get a total volume?
Also, as a physical representation, how can I visualize what volume is, as it is currently output?
A sample output I have is:
Essentially, with the framework of earthworks in mind, one could look at Added volume as Embankments and Removed volume as Excavations. What then would the purpose of the Volume field be, since it is not the combined volume of both?
Also when computing between the first scan and an arbitrary constant height, and a different scan and the same constant height, shouldn't the difference between the two Volume fields be the same as if I did the comparison between the two clouds?
I am sorry for the novel I've written instead of a post.
Thank you!
I'm sorry if I'm asking a dumb question and misunderstanding something fundamental, but I cannot understand some of the values from the volume computation tool.
I am currently trying to estimate earthworks volume between two sequential aerial scans.
I've been looking at the volume computation algorithm in the source and the help.
I believe I have a somewhat decent understanding of the algorithm, but I cannot understand why Volume is computed, essentially, as (Added volume - Removed volume).
Shouldn't the two be added as an absolute value in order to get a total volume?
Also, as a physical representation, how can I visualize what volume is, as it is currently output?
A sample output I have is:
Just a sidenote: I am aware that this is a bad cell matching count.Volume: -918.158
Surface: 972.500
----------------------
Added volume: (+)22.691
Removed volume: (-)940.849
----------------------
Matching cells: 58.9%
Non-matching cells:
ground = 0.0%
ceil = 41.1%
Average neighbors per cell: 7.5 / 8.0
Essentially, with the framework of earthworks in mind, one could look at Added volume as Embankments and Removed volume as Excavations. What then would the purpose of the Volume field be, since it is not the combined volume of both?
Also when computing between the first scan and an arbitrary constant height, and a different scan and the same constant height, shouldn't the difference between the two Volume fields be the same as if I did the comparison between the two clouds?
I am sorry for the novel I've written instead of a post.
Thank you!